Board Interlock Network Analysis
Board interlock network analysis treats the corporate economy as a network in which two firms are tied whenever they share a director, and studies how these interlocking directorates channel information, influence, and the diffusion of practices among companies. Mizruchi's 1996 Annual Review of Sociology synthesis crystallized the field, distinguishing the determinants of interlocks from their consequences and cataloguing the mechanisms — collusion, cooptation and monitoring, legitimacy, career advancement, and social cohesion — that interlocks have been argued to serve. Davis's 1991 study of how the poison-pill takeover defense spread through the board network gave the perspective its canonical demonstration that corporate practices diffuse along director ties. The method combines two-mode-to-one-mode network construction with positional metrics and diffusion modeling.
קראו את השיטה במלואה
התחברו עם חשבון חינמי כדי לקרוא חלק זה.
מפת שיטות
סביבת השיטות הקרובות — בחרו צומת כדי לחקור.
מקורות
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271 ↗
- Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. DOI: 10.2307/2393275 ↗
איך לצטט עמוד זה
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Board Interlock Network Analysis (Interlocking Directorates as Inter-Firm Networks). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/he/strategic-management/board-interlock-network-analysis
איזו שיטה?
הציבו שיטה זו לצד קרובותיה הקרובות וקראו אותן זו לצד זו — הספרייה מניחה את הספרים על השולחן; הבחירה בידיכם.
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)ניהול אסטרטגי↔ השוואה
- Merger and Acquisition Performance Event Studyניהול אסטרטגי↔ השוואה
- Upper Echelons (TMT) Analysisניהול אסטרטגי↔ השוואה