Name Authority Control Evaluation
Name authority control evaluation is the systematic assessment of how well a name authority file fulfils its core task: gathering everything by or about a given person, family, or corporate body under one controlled access point, while keeping distinct identities apart. The IFLA Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) model supplies the conceptual yardstick, defining the entities authority data describes and the user tasks — find, identify, contextualize, and justify — that authority control must support. Elaine Svenonius's analysis of the cataloguing objectives explains why collocation and disambiguation are the heart of the matter. Evaluation samples access points, measures collocation (are all of an identity's works gathered?) and disambiguation (are unlike identities kept separate?), and audits the quality of the authority records themselves against FRAD's requirements.
קראו את השיטה במלואה
התחברו עם חשבון חינמי כדי לקרוא חלק זה.
מפת שיטות
סביבת השיטות הקרובות — בחרו צומת כדי לחקור.
מקורות
- IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). (2009). Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. The Hague: IFLA (rev. 2013). link ↗
- Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262194334
איך לצטט עמוד זה
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Name Authority Control Evaluation (Assessing Identity Consistency in Authority Files). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/he/library-information-science/name-authority-control-evaluation
איזו שיטה?
הציבו שיטה זו לצד קרובותיה הקרובות וקראו אותן זו לצד זו — הספרייה מניחה את הספרים על השולחן; הבחירה בידיכם.
- Bibliographic Record Quality AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ השוואה
- Controlled Vocabulary IndexingLibrary Information Science↔ השוואה
- Metadata Quality AssessmentLibrary Information Science↔ השוואה