ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Wordfish Scaling×Wordscores×
תחוםPolitical Scienceפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור20082003
הוגה השיטהJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver ProkschMichael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John Garry
סוגUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count dataText analysis and dimension reduction
מקור מכונןSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗
כינוייםWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimation
קשורות45
תקצירWordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.Wordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Wordfish Scaling · Wordscores. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-25 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare