השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מטא-אנליזה בסיוע VOSviewer× | סקירה מבוססת PRISMA× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | סיינטומטריה | סיינטומטריה |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2010s (integration practice emerged after VOSviewer release in 2010) | 2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Workflow combining Glass (1976) meta-analysis with van Eck & Waltman (2010) VOSviewer | David Moher and PRISMA Group |
| סוג≠ | Tool-assisted evidence synthesis workflow | Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews |
| מקור מכונן≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | bibliometric-enhanced meta-analysis, VOSviewer meta-analysis workflow, science-mapping assisted meta-analysis, network-visualisation meta-analysis | PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | VOSviewer-assisted meta-analysis integrates the bibliometric network visualisation capabilities of VOSviewer into the literature identification and mapping phases of a standard meta-analysis. Before the statistical pooling of effect sizes begins, VOSviewer is used to visualise co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, and publication clusters, helping researchers comprehensively delineate the research field and identify all eligible primary studies for quantitative synthesis. | A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|