ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ראיון עומק משולש (Triangulated In-depth Interview)×ראיון עומק ממקורות מרובים×
תחוםמתודולוגיית סקריםמתודולוגיית סקרים
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1978 (triangulation framework); in-depth interviewing ~1950s onward1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature)
הוגה השיטהNorman K. Denzin (triangulation framework); in-depth interviewing practice is longstanding in qualitative researchGrounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and others
סוגQualitative data collection approachQualitative data collection technique
מקור מכונןDenzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711
כינוייםtriangulated IDI, multi-source in-depth interview, triangulated qualitative interview, converging in-depth interviewmulti-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interview
קשורות45
תקצירTriangulated in-depth interviewing applies Denzin's triangulation logic to the in-depth interview method by deliberately combining multiple sources of convergent evidence — different informants, interviewers, time points, or corroborating data types — to strengthen confidence in qualitative findings. Rather than relying on a single interview account, the researcher gathers rich, open-ended accounts from several vantage points and cross-checks them for consistency and divergence, treating agreement as corroboration and disagreement as analytically meaningful.The multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Triangulated In-depth Interview · Multi-source In-depth Interview. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare