השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ראיון טלפוני מעמיק (Telephone-assisted In-depth Interview)× | ראיון חצי-מובנה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | מתודולוגיית סקרים | איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1980s–1990s (widespread adoption) | 1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Developed from qualitative interview traditions; telephone variant documented from the 1980s onward | Robert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative research method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107–118. DOI ↗ | Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422 |
| כינויים | telephone in-depth interview, phone-based qualitative interview, TIDI, telephone qualitative interview | guided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI |
| קשורות≠ | 3 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | A telephone-assisted in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection method in which a researcher conducts a lengthy, open-ended, exploratory conversation with a participant via telephone. It preserves the depth and flexibility of face-to-face in-depth interviewing while overcoming geographic and mobility barriers, making it particularly useful when participants are dispersed, housebound, or when travel is impractical. | The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|