ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תיאוריית שדה מבוססת (Grounded Theory) בגישה הסטראוסיאנית×מחקר מקרה בוחן×
תחוםאיכותניאיכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1990 (systematic elaboration; building on Glaser & Strauss 1967)1984 (seminal codification)
הוגה השיטהAnselm Strauss & Juliet CorbinRobert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)
סוגQualitative research methodQualitative research design
מקור מכונןStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
כינוייםStrauss-Corbin GT, systematic grounded theory, GTM (Straussian), conditional/consequential matrix GTVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology
קשורות65
תקצירStraussian Grounded Theory is a systematic qualitative methodology developed by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin that generates theory inductively from data through structured coding procedures. Unlike exploratory description, it aims to produce a substantive mid-range theory that explains how a social process unfolds, grounding every theoretical claim directly in empirical evidence collected from participants who have experienced the phenomenon under study.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Straussian Grounded Theory · Case Study. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare