השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Static-99R: סולם הסיכון המתוקן להערכת סיכון של עברייני מין× | SAPROF: הערכה מובנית של גורמים מגנים מפני אלימות× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכולוגיה משפטית | פסיכולוגיה משפטית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2009 | 2012 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | R. Karl Hanson, David Thornton, Lea Helmus | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| סוג≠ | File-based / Clinician-rated | Clinician-rated |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Hanson, R. K., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2010). Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study. Sexual Abuse, 22(1), 133–153. link ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Static-99R, Static-99, Sex Offender Risk Assessment | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Static-99R is an actuarial risk assessment instrument designed to estimate the likelihood of sexual recidivism among adult male sex offenders. Originally developed as the Static-99 by Hanson and Thornton (2000) and revised in 2009 as the Static-99R by Hanson, Helmus, and Thornton, it remains one of the most widely used sexual offender risk assessment tools in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings across North America, Europe, and Australasia. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|