ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תאוריית מעשי דיבור×ניתוח שיח×
תחוםבלשנותמחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19621989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
הוגה השיטהJ. L. AustinNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
סוגEmpirical process pipelineMethod
מקור מכונןAustin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
כינוייםPragmatics, Performative AnalysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
קשורות12
תקצירSpeech Act Theory is a framework in pragmatics developed by J. L. Austin and refined by John Searle, analyzing language as action. The core insight is that utterances are not merely vehicles for propositions but acts with pragmatic effects: 'I pronounce you married' creates a marriage; 'Please close the door' issues a request; 'I promise to help' incurs an obligation. By examining the conditions under which acts succeed and the types of effects they produce, Speech Act Theory illuminates how language functions in social interaction.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Speech Act Theory · Discourse Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare