ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניסוי שדה עם סמיות-יחידה×ניסוי שדה כפול-סמיות×
תחוםתכנון ניסוייםתכנון ניסויים
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקורMid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s)1960s onward (field experiment tradition); double-blind controls applied from 1970s in social and policy field trials
הוגה השיטהEstablished practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Fisher, R. A. (randomized field trials); double-blind practice traced to 19th-century clinical research, formalized for field settings by Campbell & Stanley (1963)
סוגControlled field experiment with partial blindingExperimental design
מקור מכונןShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. W. W. Norton. ISBN: 978-0393979954
כינוייםsingle-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trialdouble-masked field trial, double-blind naturalistic experiment, blinded field study, DB field experiment
קשורות65
תקצירA single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings.A double-blind field experiment combines the high external validity of a real-world field setting with double-blind masking, in which neither the participants nor the personnel delivering the treatment know who has been assigned to the treatment or control condition. This design controls simultaneously for participant expectation effects and for experimenter/enumerator demand effects, making it one of the most rigorous tools available for causal inference outside the laboratory.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Single-blind field experiment · Double-blind field experiment. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare