ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מהימנות מבחן-מבחן חוזר של גרסה מקוצרת×ניתוח גורמים מאשר (CFA)×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1990s–2000s1969
הוגה השיטהDerived from classical test-retest reliability; short-form methodology formalised by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) among othersKarl Gustav Jöreskog
סוגReliability estimationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
מקור מכונןSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
כינוייםabbreviated scale temporal stability, short-form temporal consistency, retest reliability of short forms, SF test-retestCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
קשורות44
תקצירShort-form test-retest reliability quantifies how consistently an abbreviated version of a measurement instrument produces the same scores across two administrations separated by a defined time interval. It is a critical validation step whenever a full-length scale is shortened for practical use, confirming that item reduction has not degraded temporal stability.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Short-form test-retest reliability · Confirmatory factor analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare