ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף נומולוגי של צורה מקוצרת×תוקף מתכנס×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context)1959
הוגה השיטהCronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form applicationDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
סוגValidity assessment techniqueValidity evidence / construct validation
מקור מכונןCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
כינוייםnomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
קשורות44
תקצירShort form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Short form nomological validity · Convergent Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare