השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תוקף תוכן של תוכן מקוצר× | ניתוח פריטים בפורמט מקוצר× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1995–2000 | 1990s–2000s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) |
| סוג≠ | Validity evaluation | Item selection and evaluation procedure |
| מקור מכונן | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | abbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|