ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף מבנה של גרסה מקוצרת×תוקף מבחין×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1990s–2000s1959
הוגה השיטהMultiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
סוגValidity assessment / scale shorteningValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
מקור מכונןSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
כינוייםabbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
קשורות65
תקצירShort form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Short form construct validity · Discriminant Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare