השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תכנון ניסויים עוקבים / עוקבים מקובצים× | תכנון ניסויים קליניים אדפטיביים× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | תכנון ניסויים | תכנון ניסויים |
| משפחה | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1979 | 1994 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | O'Brien & Fleming; Pocock; Lan & DeMets | Bauer & Köhne |
| סוג≠ | Adaptive stopping trial design | Adaptive hypothesis test with interim analyses |
| מקור מכונן≠ | O'Brien, P.C. & Fleming, T.R. (1979). A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials. Biometrics, 35(3), 549–556. DOI ↗ | Bauer, P. & Köhne, K. (1994). Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim Analyses. Biometrics, 50(4), 1029–1041. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | group sequential design, adaptive stopping design, Ardışık Deneme Tasarımı (Sequential / Group Sequential) | adaptive design, group sequential design, sample size re-estimation, platform trial |
| קשורות | 3 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | Sequential and group sequential trial designs allow a study to be stopped early — or continued — based on interim analyses conducted as data accumulate. The core framework was formalised by O'Brien and Fleming in 1979 and extended by Lan and DeMets's alpha-spending approach, and it controls the overall Type I error rate across all planned looks by pre-specifying both efficacy and futility boundaries before enrolment begins. | Adaptive clinical trial design is a flexible experimental framework, formalised by Bauer and Köhne in 1994, in which pre-specified rules allow the trial to be modified mid-course — adjusting sample size, treatment arms, or randomisation ratios — based on accumulating interim data while rigorously controlling the Type I error rate. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|