השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח רגישות בשילוב עם פריסת פונקציית איכות× | ניתוח רגישות× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | תכנון ניסויים | קבלת החלטות |
| משפחה≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990s–2000s (integration period) | 2004 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Yoji Akao (QFD foundation); sensitivity extension attributed to multiple QFD researchers (1990s–2000s) | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. |
| סוג≠ | Integrated engineering design and decision analysis technique | Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2006). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2483–2504. link ↗ | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | SA-QFD, QFD sensitivity analysis, robust QFD, House of Quality sensitivity analysis | — |
| קשורות≠ | 2 | 0 |
| תקציר≠ | Sensitivity analysis integrated with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) tests how stable the prioritization of engineering characteristics remains when customer requirement weights or relationship matrix scores are varied. By systematically perturbing the inputs of the House of Quality, teams identify which design parameters are truly critical and which rankings would flip under different assumptions — turning QFD from a one-shot prioritization tool into a robust decision framework. | SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|