השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Second-Level Agenda Setting× | Media Priming Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | Communication | Communication |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1981 | 1987 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Maxwell McCombs and colleagues (Weaver et al.) | Shanto Iyengar & Donald Kinder |
| סוג≠ | Analysis of the transfer of attribute salience from media to public | Experiment testing how media attention changes the standards used to evaluate |
| מקור מכונן≠ | McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. DOI ↗ | Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226388571 |
| כינויים | Attribute agenda setting, Second-level agenda-setting analysis, Attribute salience transfer, İkinci Düzey Gündem Belirleme | Priming analysis, News priming experiment, Agenda priming study, Medya Hazırlama Deneyi |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Second-level (attribute) agenda setting extends classic agenda-setting theory from the salience of objects — which issues or people the public thinks about — to the salience of their attributes — which characteristics the public associates with them. The method codes the attributes media emphasize when covering an object and correlates that attribute agenda with the attributes salient in public perceptions. | Media priming is the process by which news attention to some issues, and not others, changes the standards people use to evaluate leaders, policies, or events. Demonstrated experimentally by Iyengar and Kinder in News That Matters, the priming experiment manipulates which issues the news emphasizes and tests whether those issues subsequently weigh more heavily in audiences' judgments — the natural extension of agenda setting from importance to evaluation. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|