ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Rubric Development×Formative Assessment×
תחוםEducationEducation
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20071998
הוגה השיטהPerformance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)Scriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis)
סוגSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performanceInstructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback
מקור מכונןJonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI ↗
כינוייםScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric ConstructionAssessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment
קשורות44
תקצירRubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Rubric Development · Formative Assessment. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-24 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare