השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מודלי משוואות מבניות חסינים× | ניתוח גורמים מאשר (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | סטטיסטיקה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1994 | 1969 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| סוג≠ | Latent variable / path model with robust inference | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | Robust SEM, SEM with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler SEM, non-normal SEM | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Robust structural equation modeling (Robust SEM) applies the full SEM framework — simultaneous estimation of measurement and structural relations among latent variables — while using corrected test statistics and sandwich standard errors that remain valid when observed data depart from multivariate normality. The Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square is the most widely used correction. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|