השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| הערכת תוקף תוכן חסינה× | פיתוח שאלון× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions) | 1991–1995 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics tradition | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| סוג≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregation | Multi-step methodological framework |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| כינויים | robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validation | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|