ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח סיכונים מתחרים רטרוספקטיבי×ניתוח קפלן-מאייר – אמידת הישרדות לא-פרמטרית×
תחוםאפידמיולוגיהאפידמיולוגיה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1978 (cause-specific); 1999 (subdistribution/Fine-Gray)1958
הוגה השיטהFine & Gray (subdistribution model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific framework)Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
סוגRetrospective observational survival analysisNonparametric survival estimator
מקור מכונןFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
כינוייםretrospective CRA, competing risks survival analysis (retrospective), cause-specific hazard analysis (retrospective), subdistribution hazard analysis (retrospective)KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve
קשורות45
תקצירRetrospective competing risks analysis applies competing risks methodology to historical (already-collected) time-to-event data in which subjects can experience one of several mutually exclusive endpoints. It uses the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific or subdistribution hazard models to estimate the probability of each event type while accounting for the fact that occurrence of one event permanently precludes the others. Widely used in oncology, cardiology, and transplant medicine where administrative or registry records are the data source.Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Retrospective competing risks analysis · Kaplan-Meier Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare