השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תכנון רגרסיה בדידה (RDD)× | מודל האפקטים הקבועים לנתוני פאנל× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | אקונומטריקה | אקונומטריקה |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2008 | 2014 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Imbens & Lemieux; Lee & Lemieux (modern practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik | Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data |
| סוג≠ | Quasi-experimental causal design | Panel data regression |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ | Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | RDD, regression discontinuity, sharp regression discontinuity, Regresyon Süreksizliği Tasarımı (RDD) | fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that estimates a local causal effect around a threshold (cutoff) value, comparing units just below and just above the cutoff as if they were almost randomly assigned. It is the design developed for applied practice by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and by Lee and Lemieux (2010). | The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014). |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|