השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תכנון רגרסיה בדידה (RDD)× | הפרש-בהפרשים (דיד)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | אקונומטריקה | אקונומטריקה |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2008 | 1994 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Imbens & Lemieux; Lee & Lemieux (modern practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| סוג≠ | Quasi-experimental causal design | Causal inference / panel regression |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| כינויים≠ | RDD, regression discontinuity, sharp regression discontinuity, Regresyon Süreksizliği Tasarımı (RDD) | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that estimates a local causal effect around a threshold (cutoff) value, comparing units just below and just above the cutoff as if they were almost randomly assigned. It is the design developed for applied practice by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and by Lee and Lemieux (2010). | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|