ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מערכת Q×אופטימיזציה של פריסת חללים כרייה (Stope Layout Optimization)×
תחוםהנדסת כרייההנדסת כרייה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19741960
הוגה השיטהNick Barton (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute)Mining Engineering Practice
סוגEmpirical index for tunnel support and stability predictionOptimization framework for underground mine excavation design
מקור מכונןBarton, N., Lien, R., & Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189-236. DOI ↗Brady, B. H. G., & Brown, E. T. (2004). Rock mechanics for underground mining. Springer Science+Business Media. link ↗
כינוייםQ Index, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Classification, Barton SystemStope Design, Underground Mine Layout, Panel Design
קשורות33
תקצירThe Q-System (NGI Index), introduced by Nick Barton and colleagues at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in 1974, is an alternative rock mass classification to RMR. It combines six parameters into a dimensionless index Q ranging from 0.001 to 1000, where higher Q values indicate better rock quality. The Q-System is particularly valued for tunnel and underground excavation design due to its explicit consideration of joint roughness and groundwater effects.Stope layout optimization is the process of designing the size, shape, and spatial arrangement of underground mine excavations (stopes) to maximize ore recovery while maintaining safety and economic viability. It balances the desire for large extraction volumes against rock mechanics constraints and support costs. The layout determines mining productivity, capital investment in support systems, and long-term mine life.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Q-System · Stope Layout. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare