ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מערכת Q×קריטריון כשל Hoek-Brown×
תחוםהנדסת כרייההנדסת כרייה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19741980
הוגה השיטהNick Barton (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute)Evert Hoek and E. T. Brown
סוגEmpirical index for tunnel support and stability predictionEmpirical criterion for rock mass strength prediction
מקור מכונןBarton, N., Lien, R., & Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189-236. DOI ↗Hoek, E., & Brown, E. T. (2002). The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI: 2018 update. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(2), 445-463. link ↗
כינוייםQ Index, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Classification, Barton SystemGeneralized Hoek-Brown Criterion, HB Criterion
קשורות33
תקצירThe Q-System (NGI Index), introduced by Nick Barton and colleagues at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in 1974, is an alternative rock mass classification to RMR. It combines six parameters into a dimensionless index Q ranging from 0.001 to 1000, where higher Q values indicate better rock quality. The Q-System is particularly valued for tunnel and underground excavation design due to its explicit consideration of joint roughness and groundwater effects.The Hoek-Brown Criterion, developed by Evert Hoek and E. T. Brown starting in 1980, is an empirical failure criterion that predicts the shear strength of rock masses as a function of confining pressure. It accounts for rock quality (via the Geological Strength Index, GSI) and thus bridges laboratory rock mechanics and field behavior. The criterion is widely used in mining for slope stability, pillar design, and stress analysis.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Q-System · Hoek-Brown Criterion. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare