ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

התאמת ציון הנטייה במחקר חינוכי×שקלול ציון הנטייה (PSW / IPW)×
תחוםהסקה סיבתיתהסקה סיבתית
משפחהRegression modelRegression model
שנת המקור1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
הוגה השיטהRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
סוגQuasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
מקור מכונןRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
כינוייםPSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
קשורות56
תקצירPropensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-20 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare