השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח ציטוטים-משותפים תואם-PRISMA× | סקירה מבוססת PRISMA× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | סיינטומטריה | סיינטומטריה |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s) | 2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973) | David Moher and PRISMA Group |
| סוג≠ | Systematic bibliometric review | Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews |
| מקור מכונן | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis | PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram. | A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|