השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניסוי קליני פְּרַגְמָטִי שלב II× | ניסוי קליני שלב II× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | אפידמיולוגיה | אפידמיולוגיה |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | Pragmatic framework: 1967; Phase II application: 1990s–2000s | 1960s–1970s (formalised in US federal drug regulation) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Conceptual basis: Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch (pragmatic vs. explanatory distinction, 1967); applied to Phase II context by drug developers and trialists from the 1990s onward | U.S. Food and Drug Administration / ICH E8 guidelines (institutionalised framework) |
| סוג≠ | Interventional study design | Interventional clinical study design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185392 |
| כינויים | pragmatic Phase II trial, real-world Phase II trial, Phase II pragmatic RCT, Phase IIb pragmatic trial | Phase 2 trial, Phase II study, early efficacy trial, proof-of-concept trial |
| קשורות | 6 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | A pragmatic Phase II clinical trial is an early-to-mid-stage interventional study that evaluates a new treatment's preliminary efficacy and safety under conditions that approximate real-world clinical practice rather than tightly controlled experimental settings. It sits between pure explanatory Phase II trials and large pragmatic Phase III confirmatory trials, prioritising practical feasibility and clinical relevance while still generating the signal needed to justify further development. | A Phase II clinical trial is the second stage in the drug or intervention development pipeline, conducted after Phase I safety testing. Its primary goal is to assess whether the intervention shows preliminary efficacy signals in a relevant patient population at the dose established in Phase I, while continuing to characterise the safety and tolerability profile. Phase II trials are generally smaller than Phase III confirmatory trials and serve as critical go/no-go decision points before large-scale investment. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|