השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| גישת מחקר מעורבת פרגמטית× | תכנון שיטות מעורבות רב-שלבי – מחקר תוכניתי רב-שלבי× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | תכנון מחקר | תכנון מחקר |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century | 2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| סוג | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute |
| כינויים | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods | multiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods |
| קשורות | 6 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. | The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|