השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח מהימנות פוליטומי× | ניתוח מהימנות אורדינלית× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2007–2009 (formal ordinal extensions); broader framework since 1950s | 2007 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Building on Cronbach (1951) and McDonald (1978); ordinal extensions by Zumbo and colleagues (2007) and Green and Yang (2009) | Bruno D. Zumbo and colleagues |
| סוג≠ | Reliability estimation | Internal consistency reliability estimation |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Green, S. B. & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 155–167. DOI ↗ | Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M. & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta as measures of internal consistency for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | polytomous scale reliability, ordinal reliability estimation, reliability for ordered-category items, polychoric reliability analysis | ordinal alpha, polychoric reliability, reliability for ordinal scales, ORA |
| קשורות≠ | 3 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Polytomous reliability analysis estimates the internal consistency or precision of measurement for scales composed of items with more than two ordered response categories, such as Likert-type, rating, or partial-credit items. It corrects a well-known underestimation bias in conventional Cronbach's alpha by working with polychoric correlations or IRT-based precision indices. | Ordinal reliability analysis estimates the internal consistency of scales whose items are measured on ordered-category (Likert-type) response formats. By basing computations on polychoric correlations rather than Pearson correlations, it corrects for the attenuation that standard Cronbach's alpha produces when responses are discrete and non-normal. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|