השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| פנומנולוגיה× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Edmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative research approach | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים | Fenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|