ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Partisan Motivated Reasoning Paradigm×Motivated Reasoning Experiment×
תחוםפסיכולוגיה פוליטיתפסיכולוגיה פוליטית
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20062006
הוגה השיטהCharles Taber & Milton LodgeCharles Taber & Milton Lodge
סוגExperimental paradigm for directional reasoningSurvey/lab experiment
מקור מכונןTaber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI ↗Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI ↗
כינוייםMotivated Skepticism Paradigm, Directional Motivated Reasoning Design, Disconfirmation Bias Experiment, Partisan Bias Information-Processing ParadigmDirectional Motivated Reasoning Study, Biased Assimilation Experiment, Disconfirmation Bias Paradigm
קשורות34
תקצירThe partisan motivated reasoning paradigm is the experimental template for showing that citizens process political information to protect their existing loyalties rather than to reach accurate conclusions. In Taber and Lodge's foundational 2006 design, partisans who read balanced pro and con arguments rated congenial arguments as stronger, spent effort counterarguing uncongenial ones, sought out confirming information, and ended up more extreme than they began. Martin Bisgaard's later work extends the logic to facts, showing that even when partisans accept the same factual reality they reinterpret who deserves credit or blame, so getting the facts right can paradoxically fuel rather than dampen partisan reasoning.A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Partisan Motivated Reasoning Paradigm · Motivated Reasoning Experiment. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-25 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare