השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| הערכת תוכניות השתתפותית× | מחקר פעולה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | שיטות שדה | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1992 (formal articulation); roots in participatory action research of the 1970s–1980s | 1946 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | J. Bradley Cousins & Lorna Earl (formalization); Michael Q. Patton (utilization-focused lineage) | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| סוג≠ | Applied evaluation approach | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397–418. DOI ↗ | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | participatory evaluation, collaborative evaluation, PE, stakeholder-involved evaluation | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| קשורות≠ | 3 | 1 |
| תקציר≠ | Participatory program evaluation is an applied evaluation approach in which program stakeholders — staff, participants, funders, or community members — are actively involved as co-evaluators rather than passive subjects. By engaging those closest to the program in designing questions, collecting data, and interpreting findings, the approach aims to increase both the quality of the evaluation and the likelihood that findings will be understood, owned, and acted upon. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|