השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| אתנוגרפיה השתתפותית× | מחקר פעולה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990s–2000s (collaborative turn); classical roots early 20th century | 1946 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Rooted in classical ethnography (Malinowski, Boas); collaborative turn formalised by Luke Eric Lassiter and others in the 1990s–2000s | Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226469058 | Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | collaborative ethnography, participatory fieldwork, engaged ethnography, community-based ethnography | Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 1 |
| תקציר≠ | Participatory ethnography is a qualitative research design in which community members are not merely subjects of study but active collaborators throughout the research process — from problem formulation and data collection to analysis and writing. Building on classical ethnographic fieldwork, it shifts the researcher–participant relationship toward genuine partnership, producing knowledge that is accountable to the communities from which it emerges. | Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|