השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| סולם עייפות ממגפה× | מדד ההתנהגות להגנה על הבריאות (HPBS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | בריאות הציבור | בריאות הציבור |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2020 | 2011 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Restrepo et al. | Bish & Michie |
| סוג | Self-report | Self-report |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Restrepo, A., Pfeil, J., & Farias, M. (2021). Pandemic fatigue and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a representative US sample. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 1093–1101. link ↗ | Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797–824. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | PFS, COVID Fatigue Scale | HPBS, Protective Behavior Scale |
| קשורות | 3 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | The Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) measures psychological exhaustion and reduced motivation to maintain protective behaviors during prolonged pandemics. Developed by Restrepo and colleagues, it captures the phenomenon whereby individuals progressively abandon preventive measures (distancing, mask-wearing, testing) despite ongoing transmission risk, driven by 'fatigue' or loss of motivation rather than reduced threat perception. The PFS has become essential for monitoring behavioral adherence trends and explaining divergence between risk and protective behavior during multi-wave pandemics. | The Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) assesses self-reported engagement in preventive behaviors during infectious disease outbreaks, including hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, isolation, and vaccination. Developed from literature review and behavioral theory by Bish and Michie, and refined through implementation research by Conner and colleagues, it measures adherence to public health guidance. The HPBS is widely used in pandemic surveillance research and behavioral intervention trials to track population adoption of protective measures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|