ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

דגימת משקל מקוונת×שקלול ציון הנטייה (PSW / IPW)×
תחוםמתודולוגיית סקריםהסקה סיבתית
משפחהProcess / pipelineRegression model
שנת המקורLate 1990s–2000s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
הוגה השיטהSurvey methodology practitioners; systematized via probability-based online panels (e.g., Knowledge Networks, founded late 1990s)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
סוגProbability-adjusted online sampling techniqueCausal inference / reweighting
מקור מכונןDillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118456149Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
כינוייםweb-based weighted sampling, internet survey weighting, online panel weighting, weighted internet samplingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
קשורות46
תקצירOnline weighted sampling is the practice of recruiting respondents via internet platforms and then applying statistical weights to correct for unequal selection probabilities, coverage gaps, and differential non-response. It enables researchers to draw valid population inferences from web surveys by compensating for the structural biases inherent in online recruitment — including the fact that not all members of a target population have equal internet access or equal likelihood of joining a panel.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Online Weighted Sampling · Propensity Score Weighting. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare