ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תיאוריית תהליך הנורמליזציה (NPT)×תרגום ידע×
תחוםמדע היישוםמדע היישום
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20062004
הוגה השיטהMay, C. R.Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
סוגFrameworkFramework
מקור מכונןMay, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗
כינוייםNPT, normalization theory, routinizationKT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice
קשורות55
תקצירNormalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project.Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Normalization Process Theory · Knowledge Translation. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare