ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח מעטפת נתונים רשתי (Network DEA)×DEA באמצעות Bootstrap: תיקון הטיה ורווחי סמך לציוני יעילות×מדד מלמקוויסט לפרודוקטיביות×
תחוםניתוח יעילותניתוח יעילותניתוח יעילות
משפחהRegression modelRegression modelRegression model
שנת המקור200019981994
הוגה השיטהFäre & GrosskopfSimar & WilsonFäre, Grosskopf, Norris & Zhang
סוגMulti-stage nonparametric efficiency modelNonparametric efficiency estimation with bootstrap inferenceNon-parametric productivity index
מקור מכונןFäre, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. DOI ↗Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. DOI ↗Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83. link ↗
כינוייםNetwork Data Envelopment Analysis, Network Efficiency Analysis, Multi-Stage DEA, Ağ Veri Zarflama AnaliziBootstrapped DEA, DEA Bootstrap Inference, Simar-Wilson Bootstrap, Bootstrap Sınır AnaliziMPI, Malmquist Index, Malmquist DEA Productivity Index, Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi
קשורות221
תקצירNetwork Data Envelopment Analysis (Network DEA) is a nonparametric efficiency measurement framework introduced by Färe and Grosskopf (2000) that extends classical DEA to multi-stage or multi-division production processes. Rather than treating a decision-making unit as a black box, it explicitly models the internal structure — the divisions and the intermediate products that flow between them — enabling stage-level and overall efficiency scores to be estimated simultaneously within a single coherent model.Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (Bootstrap DEA) is a resampling-based extension of standard DEA that provides statistically valid inference for efficiency scores. Introduced by Simar and Wilson in 1998, it addresses the core weakness of classical DEA — its inability to quantify uncertainty in estimated scores — by constructing bootstrap confidence intervals and bias-corrected efficiency estimates from repeatedly resampled pseudo-frontiers.The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is a non-parametric measure of total factor productivity (TFP) change over time. Formally grounded in distance functions by Caves, Christensen, and Diewert (1982) and operationalized using Data Envelopment Analysis by Färe, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang (1994), MPI decomposes productivity growth into two components: efficiency change (catching-up to the frontier) and technical change (shift of the frontier itself).
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Network DEA · Bootstrap DEA · Malmquist Productivity Index. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare