ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מטא-אנליזה מבוססת רשת×ניתוח מטא-אנליזה רשתי×
תחוםסיינטומטריהסינתזת ראיות
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור2002 (Lumley); refined 2008–20122002
הוגה השיטהThomas Lumley (statistical framework); Georgia Salanti (SUCRA and ranking methods)Lumley (2002)
סוגQuantitative evidence synthesisMethod
מקור מכונןLumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗
כינוייםNMA, network meta-analysis, mixed-treatment comparison, multiple-treatments meta-analysisMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis
קשורות51
תקצירNetwork-based Meta-analysis (NMA) extends conventional pairwise meta-analysis by simultaneously synthesizing evidence across a network of two or more competing treatments, including pairs that have never been compared head-to-head in a single trial. By combining direct and indirect evidence within a coherent statistical model, NMA produces relative effect estimates for all treatment pairs and generates a probabilistic ranking of which treatment performs best on the outcome of interest.Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Network-based Meta-analysis · Network Meta-Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare