ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח תמטי מרובה מבוסס-מקרים×Thematic Analysis×
תחוםאיכותנימחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור2000s–2010s (integration period)2006
הוגה השיטהSynthesized from Braun & Clarke (thematic analysis) and Yin (multiple case study design)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
סוגQualitative comparative designMethod
מקור מכונןBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
כינוייםcross-case thematic analysis, multi-case thematic analysis, comparative thematic analysis, MCBTATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
קשורות43
תקצירMultiple case-based thematic analysis (MCBTA) is a qualitative design that applies thematic analysis sequentially within each case and then comparatively across cases. It combines the bounded, contextual focus of multiple case study methodology with the systematic coding and theme-development procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, enabling researchers to identify both case-specific patterns and shared themes that hold across contexts.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multiple Case-Based Thematic Analysis · Thematic Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare