השוואת שיטות

	תאוריית grounded מרובת מקרים מבוססת שטראוס	תיאוריית שדה מבוססת (Grounded Theory) בגישה הסטראוסיאנית
תחום	איכותני	איכותני
משפחה	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
שנת המקור	1990s (synthesis of Strauss & Corbin 1990 and multi-case design conventions)	1990 (systematic elaboration; building on Glaser & Strauss 1967)
הוגה השיטה	Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); multiple-case design formalized by Robert K. Yin and Kathleen Eisenhardt	Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin
סוג	Qualitative research design and analytic strategy	Qualitative research method
מקור מכונן	Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500	Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500
כינויים	multi-case Straussian GT, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory across cases, multiple-site Straussian grounded theory, multi-case GT (Strauss & Corbin)	Strauss-Corbin GT, systematic grounded theory, GTM (Straussian), conditional/consequential matrix GT
קשורות	6	6
תקציר	Multiple case-based Straussian grounded theory combines Strauss and Corbin's systematic coding procedures — open, axial, and selective coding — with a multiple case design in which the same grounded theory analysis is conducted across two or more purposively selected cases. The approach aims to generate a mid-range theory grounded in rich, cross-case qualitative data while capitalizing on the comparative leverage offered by multiple sites or units, ultimately producing a theory with broader scope and stronger transferability than a single-case grounded theory study.	Straussian Grounded Theory is a systematic qualitative methodology developed by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin that generates theory inductively from data through structured coding procedures. Unlike exploratory description, it aims to produce a substantive mid-range theory that explains how a social process unfolds, grounding every theoretical claim directly in empirical evidence collected from participants who have experienced the phenomenon under study.