ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח מטאפורות מבוסס-ריבוי מקרים×Thematic Analysis×
תחוםאיכותנימחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research)2006
הוגה השיטהBuilding on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logicVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
סוגQualitative comparative designMethod
מקור מכונןLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
כינוייםcross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
קשורות63
תקצירMultiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multiple Case-Based Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare