ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח מטאפורות מבוסס-ריבוי מקרים×ניתוח שיח×
תחוםאיכותנימחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
הוגה השיטהBuilding on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logicNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
סוגQualitative comparative designMethod
מקור מכונןLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
כינוייםcross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMADA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
קשורות62
תקצירMultiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multiple Case-Based Metaphor Analysis · Discourse Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare