השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח שיח ביקורתי מרובה-מקרים× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990s–2000s (CDA foundations ~1989–1995; multiple case integration in applied discourse research) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Norman Fairclough (CDA); Robert K. Yin (multiple case design) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic method | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | multi-case CDA, comparative critical discourse analysis, cross-case CDA, multiple case CDA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Multiple case-based critical discourse analysis (multi-case CDA) combines the comparative logic of multiple case study design with the ideological and power-focused analytic apparatus of critical discourse analysis. The researcher selects two or more purposefully chosen cases, collects relevant texts or spoken discourse within each, applies CDA to reveal how language constructs power relations and ideologies within each case, and then synthesises findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and broader sociocritical insights that a single-case design could not yield. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|