השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח שיחה מרובה-מקרה× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert Yin | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative multi-case analytic design | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|