השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Multilevel Item Response Theory× | תיאוריית תגובת פריט (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | Education | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2010 | 1952–1968 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Adams, Wilson & Wu; Fox & Glas; De Boeck & Wilson | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| סוג≠ | Item response models with a multilevel structure on the latent ability | Probabilistic measurement model |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Fox, J.-P. (2010). Bayesian Item Response Modeling: Theory and Applications. Springer. DOI ↗ | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| כינויים | Multilevel IRT, MLIRT, Hierarchical IRT, Explanatory Item Response Models | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| קשורות≠ | 4 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Multilevel item response theory (MLIRT) joins two powerful frameworks: an IRT measurement model that turns item responses into a latent ability, and a multilevel structural model that explains how that ability varies across nested groups such as classrooms, schools, or countries. Instead of first scoring a test and then running a multilevel regression on the scores, MLIRT does both at once, so that measurement error in ability is properly carried into the group-level analysis. It is the rigorous way to study how student and school characteristics relate to a latent trait measured by a test. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|