ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף מבחין רב-רמתי×אינווריאנטיוּת מדידה רב-רמתית×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור20052000s
הוגה השיטהDyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestMuthén, Asparouhov, and colleagues
סוגValidity evaluation within multilevel CFAMeasurement model evaluation
מקור מכונןDyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(2), 250–270. link ↗
כינוייםmultilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVMLMI, multilevel factorial invariance, cross-level measurement invariance, multilevel CFA invariance
קשורות53
תקצירMultilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Multilevel measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a latent construct is measured equivalently both within clusters (e.g., individuals within teams) and between clusters (e.g., team-level aggregates). It extends standard measurement invariance procedures to nested data structures commonly encountered in organisational, educational, and cross-cultural research.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Multilevel Measurement Invariance. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-19 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare