ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף מבחין רב-רמתי×תוקף מתכנס רב-רמתי×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור20052005
הוגה השיטהDyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestDyer, Hanges & Hall; Chen, Bliese & Mathieu
סוגValidity evaluation within multilevel CFAMeasurement validity evaluation
מקור מכונןDyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J. & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗
כינוייםmultilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVcross-level convergent validity, multilevel measurement validity, between-level convergent validity
קשורות54
תקצירMultilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Multilevel convergent validity evaluates whether items or scales intended to measure the same construct show coherent, strong associations at each level of a nested data structure — within individuals, within groups, and between groups. It extends classical convergent validity from single-level measurement models into the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) framework.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Multilevel Convergent Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare