ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף מבחין רב-רמתי×ניתוח גורמים מאשר (CFA)×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור20051969
הוגה השיטהDyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestKarl Gustav Jöreskog
סוגValidity evaluation within multilevel CFAHypothesis-testing latent variable model
מקור מכונןDyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
כינוייםmultilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
קשורות54
תקצירMultilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare