ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף תוכן רב-רמתי×פיתוח סולם רב-רמתי×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1975–2000s1990s–2000s
הוגה השיטהRooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onwardRaudenbush, Bryk, Hox and colleagues
סוגValidity evaluation / expert judgmentHierarchical measurement / scale construction
מקור מכונןLynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728462
כינוייםhierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCVmultilevel measurement modeling, hierarchical scale development, MLSEM scale construction, nested data scale development
קשורות65
תקצירMultilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.Multilevel scale development constructs and validates measurement instruments for data collected from individuals nested within higher-level units such as classrooms, organizations, or clinics. It partitions item variance into within-group and between-group components, ensuring that reliability and factor structure are evaluated at both levels simultaneously.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Content Validity · Multilevel Scale Development. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare